Dry dock technology is, in itself, no major security risk, but this simple project offers an unmatched opportunity to identify potential problems early-and it would advance Australia’s ability to support submarines of any type in Western Australia.Īnother simple step would be to build-out a submarine tender support base, followed by the fabrication of an Australian submarine tender. submarines are likely to be forward-based and need dry dock access, is a simple first step. drydock plans to Australia, and then building a new dry dock in Perth, where U.S. Navy contract to build a floating dry dock, well-positioned to support that demand. After the USS Connecticut (SSN-22), a Seawolf submarine, ran into an undersea feature in 2021, sub-ready dry docks became a hot commodity throughout the Pacific.Īustal USA, a subsidiary of West Australian-based shipbuilding company Austal Limited, is, after winning a $128 million U.S. Instead of a new nuclear submarine, a good start for AUKUS might be a certified, nuclear submarine-ready dry dock. Instead, a steady stream of simple, far less-sensitive projects can help prepare Australia’s non-traditional defense partners-the small innovators, shipbuilders, and others-to manage highly secured information on nuclear submarines, strengthening Australia’s industrial base to where it can maintain and operate their new undersea platforms from “day one”. In 2016, technical information on France’s widely-exported Scorpene class submarine was stolen and released, shaking up France-India technological exchange efforts and echoing into Australia’s aborted $50 billion submarine deal with France.Ī headlong rush into a hasty exchange of secretive submarine technology does little good for anyone outside of China.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |